Carlos Arturo Ramirez Escobar


El componente energético de los programas de estudios de Ingeniería Ambiental es establecido con base en los métodos de determinación de los Índices de Calidad Ambiental (ICAs). Así, los métodos exérgico y emergético se centran en el estudio de las transformaciones energéticas. Además, las escuelas de aplicación denominadas “Economía Ecológica”, “Ecología Industrial” e “Ingeniería Ecológica”, están relacionadas con los programas de investigación en estos métodos. El protocolo de Kyoto define las cantidades de emisiones utilizando estos métodos. Sin embargo, en la vía del cumplimiento de este Protocolo en la Unión Europea, las valoraciones obtenidas por estos métodos son complementadas mediante la implementación de subastas electrónicas ambientales. Estas subastas se implementan como un mecanismo pragmático de asignación y valoración de derechos de emisión de CO2e internalización de los costos ambientales. En consecuencia, se concluye que los programas de estudios de ingeniería ambiental deben incluir el logro de las habilidades cognitivas en estos métodos y aspectos de la valoración de la calidad ambiental.

Palabras clave

educación ambiental, exergia, emergía, subastas ambientales

Texto completo:



ALEX ANDROVSKI, A. Y., M. I. KNELLER, D. N. KOROBOVA, MALININ N.K., B. I. OBREZKOV, A. S. REZNIKOVSKI, AND B. I. SILIAEV 1988. Hidroenergética. Energoatomizdat, Moscú.

AYRES, R. AND B. WARR. Two Paradigms of Production and Growth. 2003. International Energy Agency. Annual Meeting of the International Energy Workshop jointly organized by EMF/IEA/IIASA 24-26 June 2003 at the Conference Center. Laxenburg, AUSTRIA. 24-6-2003. Ref Type: Conference Proceeding

AYRES, R. U. 1998. Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law. Ecological Economics 26: 189-209.

A Y R E S , R . U. A N D A . V. K N E S E E . 19 6 9. Production,Consumption and Externalities. American Economic Review 59: 282-297.

BASTIANONI, S. AND N. MARCHETTINI. 1996. Ethanol production from biomass: Analysis of process efficiency and sustainability. Biomass and Bioenergy 11: 411-418.

-----. 2000. The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by emergy analysis. Ecological Modelling 129: 187-193.

BROWN, M. T. AND S. ULGIATI. 2002. Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 10: 321-334.

BROWN, M. T., H. T. ODUM, AND S. E. JORGENSEN. 2004. Energy hierarchy and transformity in the universe. Ecological Modelling 178: 17-28.

BURTRAW, D., K. PALMER, R. BHARVIRKAR, AND A. PAUL. 2002. The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances. The Electricity Journal 15: 51-62.

CASON, T. N., L. GANGADHARAN, AND C. DUKE. 2003. Market power in tradable emission markets: a laboratory testbed for emission trading in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Ecological Economics 46: 469-491.

CASTILLO, E. F. AND M. MORA. 2000. Mathematical modelling as a tool for environmental evaluation of industrial sectors in Colombia. Waste Management 20: 617-623.

CHEN, B. AND G. Q. CHEN. Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy--A case study of the Chinese society. Ecological Modelling In Press, Corrected Proof.

-----. Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001. Ecological Economics In Press, Corrected Proof.

CHEN, G. Q., M. M. JIANG, B. CHEN, Z. F. YANG, AND C. LIN. 2006. Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115: 161-173.

COGNITIVE SCIENCE LABORATORY. WordNet. http:// wordnet.princeton.edu/ . 2006. Princeton University . Ref Type: Electronic Citation

CUADRA, M. AND T. RYDBERG. 2006. Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua. Ecological Modelling 196: 421-433.

DEWULF, J. AND H. VAN LANGENHOVE. 2005. Integrating industrial ecology principles into a set of environmental sustainability indicators for technology assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43: 419-432.

DINCER, I. 2002. The role of exergy in energy policy making. Energy Policy 30: 137-149.

GREENPEACE. Como conseguir unos objetivos más ambiciosos en el segundo Plan Nacional de Asignación de derechos de emisiones. 2006. www.greenpeace.es, Greenpeace España. Ref Type: Report

HIZEN, Y. AND T. SAIJO. 2001. Designing GHG emissions trading institutions in the Kyoto protocol: an experimental approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 16: 533-543.

HOTZ, N., M. T. LEE, C. P. GRIGOROPOULOS, S. M. SENN, AND D. POULIKAKOS. 2006. Exergetic analysis of fuel cell micropowerplants fed by methanol. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49: 2397-2411.

HUANG, S. L. 1998. Urban ecosystems, energetic hierarchies, and ecological economics of Taipei metropolis. Journal of Environmental Management 52: 39-51.

HUANG, S. L. AND W. L. HSU. 2003. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 61-74.

JANSSON, A., M. HAMMER, F. CARL, AND C. ROBERT 1994. Investing in Natural Capital . Island Press.

JI, X. AND G. Q. CHEN. 2006. Exergy analysis of energy utilization in the transportation sector in China. Energy Policy 34: 1709-1719.

JORGENSEN, S. E. AND B. D. FATH. 2006. Examination of ecological networks. Ecological Modelling 196: 283-288.

JORGENSEN, S. E., H. T. ODUM, AND M. T. BROWN. 2004. Emergy and exergy stored in genetic information. Ecological Modelling 178: 11-16.

JORGE NSE N, S. E ., B. C . PAT T E N, A N D M. STRASKRABA. 2000. Ecosystems emerging:: 4. growth. Ecological Modelling 126: 249-284.

KLAASSEN, G., A. NENTJES, AND M. SMITH. 2005. Testing the theory of emissions trading: Experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading. Ecological Economics 53: 47-58.

LEDYARD, J. O. AND K. SZAKALY-MOORE. 1994. Designing organizations for trading pollution rights. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 25: 167-196.

MARCHETTINI, N., R. RIDOLFI, AND M. RUSTICI. An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies. Waste Management In Press, Corrected Proof.

MARTIN, J. F., S. A. W. DIEMONT, E. POWELL, M. STANTON, AND S. LEV Y-TACHER. 2006. Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and

management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115: 128-140.

MARUOKA, N. AND T. AKIYAMA. 2006. Exergy recovery from steelmaking off-gas by latent heat storage for methanol production. Energy 31: 1632-1642.

MEILLAUD, F., J. B. GAY, AND M. T. BROWN. 2005. Evaluation of a building using the emergy method. Solar Energy 79: 204-212.

MOUNTOURIS, A., E. VOUTSAS, AND D. TASSIOS. 2006. Solid waste plasma gasification: Equilibrium model development and exergy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 47: 1723-1737.


Ref Type: Statute ODUM, H. T. 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy

and Environmental Decision Making. Wiley.

ODUM, H. T. AND B. ODUM. 2003. Concepts and methods of ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 20: 339-361.

PYKH, Y. A., E. T. KENNEDY, AND W. E. GRANT. 2000. An overview of systems analysis methods in delineating environmental quality indices. Ecological Modelling 130: 25-38.

RIVERO, R., G. MONTERO, AND R. PULIDO. 1990. Terminologia para la aplicacion del metodo de Exergia. Revista del IMIQ 17: 7-11.

RYDBERG, T. AND A. C. HADEN. Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: Assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment In Press, Corrected Proof.

SALA, J. M., L. M. LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, M. RUIZ DE ADANA, J. L. MIGUEZ, J. EGUIA, AND I. FLORES. 2006. Exergetic analysis and thermoeconomic study for a container-housed engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 26:


SCIENCEMAN, D. M. 1997. Letters to the Editor: Emergy definition. Ecological Engineering 9: 209-212.

SEAGER, T. P. AND T. L. THEIS. 2004. A taxonomy of metrics for testing the industrial ecology hypotheses and application to design of freezer insulation. Journal of Cleaner Production 12: 865-875.

SIRACUSA, G. AND A. D. LA ROSA. Design of a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment in a Sicilian town and environmental evaluation using the emergy analysis. Ecological Modelling In Press, Corrected Proof.

SVENDSEN, G. T. AND J. L. CHRISTENSEN. 1999. The US SO2 auction: analysis and generalization. Energy Economics 21: 403-416.

TOULMIN, S. 2003. Regreso a la razón. El debate entre la racionalidad y la experiencia y la práctica personales en el mundo contemporáneo. (Return to Reason. 2001). Ediciones Peninsula, Barcelona.

ULGIATI, S. 2001. A Comprehensive Energy and Economic Assessment of Biofuels: When “Green” Is Not Enough. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 20: 71-106.

ULGIATI, S. AND M. T. BROWN. 2002. Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions: The case of electricity production. Journal of Cleaner Production 10: 335-348.

UTLU, Z. AND A. HEPBASLI. 2006. Estimating the energy and exergy utilization efficiencies for the residential-commercial sector: an application. Energy Policy 34: 1097-1105.

UTLU, Z., Z. SOGUT, A. HEPBASLI, AND Z. OKTAY. 2006. Energy and exergy analyses of a raw mill in a cement production. Applied Thermal Engineering 26: 2479-2489.

WANG, L., W. NI, AND Z. LI. 2006. Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant eco-industrial park (CHP plant EIP). Resources, Conservation and Recycling 48: 56-70.

WANG, W., R. ZMEUREANU, AND H. RIVARD. 2005. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment 40: 1512-1525.

YANG, H., Y. LI, J. SHEN, AND S. HU. 2003. Evaluating waste treatment, recycle and reuse in industrial system: an application of the eMergy approach. Ecological Modelling 160: 13-21.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26564/19001355.257

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.

Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Clepsidra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26564/issn.1900-1355